From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 7 00:27:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3847716A412 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from justin@sk1llz.net) Received: from sed.awknet.com (sed.awknet.com [66.152.175.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A7B13C4E5 for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 00:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from justin@sk1llz.net) Received: by sed.awknet.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id D324210BBE4F; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:27:22 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on sed.awknet.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (cpe-76-167-105-254.socal.res.rr.com [76.167.105.254]) by sed.awknet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7777710BBCF9 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:27:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45C91CDF.7000509@sk1llz.net> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 16:27:11 -0800 From: Justin Robertson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <45C8E2A2.9040204@sk1llz.net> <45C8EC53.8020803@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <45C8EC53.8020803@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 6.x, 4.x ipfw/dummynet pf/altq - network performance issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:27:23 -0000 Err, forgot to reply to -net, at anyrate, layer 2 isn't useful as it doesn't undertand ip addresses, ports, protocols, etc. Julian Elischer wrote: > Justin Robertson wrote: >> > > > >> Splitting the task into a transparent filtering bridge with a >> separate routing box appears to clear it up entirely. > > how does that differ from using mac level ipfw? > > i.e. turning on filtering at the NIC (layer 2). > > (have you tried doing that?) >