From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 3 21:34:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A27F106566C for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+TV=aa29550d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D6A8FC1C for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+TV=aa29550d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A64D05A3 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:34:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:34:54 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080303213454.53f29198@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <47CC49B8.6080501@bsdforen.de> References: <47CBC3C5.9050007@bsdforen.de> <20080303155354.2043d131@gumby.homeunix.com.> <47CC49B8.6080501@bsdforen.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: interactive ports - the plague X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:34:58 -0000 On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:55:52 +0100 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:24:21 +0100 > > Dominic Fandrey wrote: > > > >> I cannot find any policy on interactive ports in the Porters' > >> Handbook. Maybe there aught to be one. > > > > Setting BATCH is supposed to prevent genuinely interactive ports > > from building (that's actually the original purpose of BATCH). > > But this will also keep the config screens away from me, which can be > handled before all builds quite comfortably. Not if you do the config screens before setting BATCH.