From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 4 14:21:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713B237B401; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488F843E3B; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 14:21:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g94LLlpS087577; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 23:21:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: Ruslan Ermilov , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vote: lib/libexpat -> lib/libbsdxml In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2002 17:15:24 EDT." Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 23:21:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87576.1033766507@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: >(renaming the directory seems like a fine idea to me, but I think >you should check with PHK first, seeing that he is very actively >working there) My initial thought was that leaving the directory called libexpat was a nice way of paying homage, and if we decide to reverse the naming decision later it would save us trouble. That's why I didn't ask for a repo-move/copy. If the concensus is that the directory should be renamed, I have no objections to that, I'll just go with the flow. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message