From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Oct 31 0:33:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from jason.argos.org (jason.argos.org [216.233.245.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8471D37B4C5 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:33:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by jason.argos.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e9V8VDO18992; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:31:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 03:31:13 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Nowlin To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rc.firewall by default does not allow nat of private internal addresses? In-Reply-To: <20001031000521.E75251@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Crist J . Clark wrote: > a bunch of other nets including 65.0.0.0-95.255.255.255. Unfortunately, > although those blocks _were_ IANA reserved when she made her slides a > few months ago, the 65/8 and 66/8 blocks have been allocated for use I must chuckle a bit.... (Quiet "chort, snort, gaffaw.") These are the some of the same guys saying that "we're running out of v4 addressing space!".... 65/8 - 95/8... 520,093,696 addresses... :) (I AM in favor of switching things to IPv6 right now, screw whoever's not ready... We'll work out the problems en route. :) ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Understated/funny man-page sentence of the current time period: From route(4) on FreeBSD-3.4, DESCRIPTION section: "FreeBSD provides some packet routing facilities." ...duh....... Mike Nowlin, N8NVW mike@argos.org http://www.viewsnet.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message