From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 18 23:49:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (s205m7.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B37F14C93 for ; Tue, 18 May 1999 23:49:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id XAA57556; Tue, 18 May 1999 23:48:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199905190648.XAA57556@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: syscons update - stage 2 snopshot 17 May In-Reply-To: <19990517191842.A89207@myhakas.matti.ee> from Vallo Kallaste at "May 17, 99 07:18:42 pm" To: vallo@matti.ee Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 23:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Cc: yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Vallo Kallaste writes: > > - History buffer (back-scroll buffer) management functions are moved > > to a new file, schistory.c. > > My question is slightly off-topic, but.. is it now possible (or in the > future) to choose which key combination to use for back-scroll buffer > handling? I personally prefer the Linux way, +, no > flames please. I can live with current combination but it's the one > feature I miss. Yeah, I'd like that too. It would make it consistent with xterm. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message