From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 4 11:37:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from c007.snv.cp.net (c007-h000.c007.snv.cp.net [209.228.33.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD44D37B718 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2001 11:37:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from otterr@telocity.com) Received: (cpmta 28326 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2001 11:37:42 -0800 Received: from dsl-216-227-91-85.telocity.com (HELO zoso) (216.227.91.85) by smtp.telocity.com (209.228.33.206) with SMTP; 4 Mar 2001 11:37:42 -0800 X-Sent: 4 Mar 2001 19:37:42 GMT From: "Otter" To: "'Mike Harding'" Cc: Subject: RE: Version Numbering Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 14:26:55 -0500 Message-ID: <000601c0a4e1$1365a800$1401a8c0@zoso> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010304190147.1F5C0E6B0A@netcom1.netcom.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG futuristic? uummm... wasn't 2000 last year? can we please kill this thread now? -Otter > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Harding > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 2:02 PM > To: tom@uniserve.com > Cc: ajh3@chmod.ath.cx; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Version Numbering > > > > Let's call it "FreeBSD 2000" so it sounds futuristic. > > Oh... Sorry. :) > > - Mike H. > > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 09:28:07 -0800 (PST) > From: Tom > X-Sender: tom@athena.uniserve.ca > Cc: FreeBSD-stable > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Precedence: bulk > > > On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Andrew Hesford wrote: > > > What with all the version inflation going on in the > Linux world, I have > > an idea for FreeBSD. > > > > Forget 4.3-STABLE. Skip to 4.4. And rather than calling > it FreeBSD > > 4.4-STABLE, call it 4.4FreeBSD. That way, we can show > off the roots of > > FreeBSD and make it sound cool, too! > > This discussion already occured over a year ago. Use > the archive. > > > Or, we can stop people from asking, "Why is RedHat in version 7, > > Mandrake almost in version 8, and FreeBSD only in 4?" > (assuming RedHat > > users even know what FreeBSD is). Just call the next > release FreeBSD > > 10.3-STABLE or FreeBSD 2001-STABLE. > > Are people seriously fooled by version numbers? I've > never seen anyone > on this list ask why the version number wasn't bigger. > > > -- > > Andrew Hesford > > ajh3@chmod.ath.cx > > > Tom > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message