Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:54:37 +0530 From: "N. Raghavendra" <raghu@mri.ernet.in> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: India had no FreeBSD mirror sites ?!? Message-ID: <16990.42837.393969.612970@riemann.mri.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <938568187.20050414143549@wanadoo.fr> References: <20050414071958.23388.qmail@web54004.mail.yahoo.com> <425E32A2.1080809@gmail.com> <938568187.20050414143549@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2005-04-14T14:35:49+02:00, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > All the more reason to have a mirror in India. The shorter the > distance to cover, the faster the transfer is likely to be, and the > lower the cost. Traffic between two hosts located in India is usually routed through US or European networks. For example, here is the output of `traceroute' from a host in Allahabad in the North, to Bombay in the West of India. [unicorn:/usr/home/raghu]% traceroute -n www.tifr.res.in traceroute to tifrweb.tifr.res.in (158.144.1.39), ... 1 192.168.10.1 0.685 ms 0.508 ms 0.257 ms 2 210.212.50.1 1.270 ms 1.103 ms 1.054 ms 3 61.0.97.46 3.132 ms 3.075 ms 3.147 ms 4 61.0.233.30 234.942 ms 245.254 ms 230.948 ms 5 61.0.229.62 384.842 ms 484.036 ms 433.154 ms 6 203.197.28.86 739.762 ms 612.132 ms 650.285 ms 7 202.54.2.26 518.586 ms 411.083 ms 434.881 ms 8 208.192.183.149 551.193 ms 567.015 ms 487.806 ms ... 20 202.84.154.6 874.091 ms 885.075 ms 1082.661 ms 21 202.84.154.130 877.544 ms 738.263 ms 787.024 ms 22 134.159.128.42 547.869 ms 564.489 ms 548.837 ms 23 219.64.254.145 755.060 ms 808.728 ms 893.595 ms ... A `whois' lookup for 208.192.183.149, says that the address belongs to UUNET Technologies, Inc., VA, US. The address 134.159.128.42 belongs to Reach Networks HK Ltd, Hong Kong. As I understand it, this means that traffic from Allahabad goes to the US, and then to Hong Kong, before it reaches Bombay. Therefore, the geographical proximity of two hosts within India does not imply their proximity on the Internet. In addition to such routing troubles, most Indian sites suffer from severe bandwidth paucity. A few years ago, an Indian research institute set up a mirror of the electronic preprint repository `arXiv.org'. However, because of routing anomalies --- and because the Indian site does not have as much bandwidth as the master `arXiv.org' site in the US --- many users find that it is faster to download papers from the master site, than from the Indian mirror. I think that would be the case also with a FreeBSD mirror in India. This could be one reason why there are no such mirrors. Another could be the fact that very few Indians use UNIX, or its clones --- and those who do mostly use GNU/Linux. > Additionally, a mirror site in India could burn CDs locally and hand > them out There are a few Indian shops which do sell inexpensive FreeBSD and GNU/Linux CD-ROMs --- costing about USD 4.00 for three CDs. Raghavendra. -- N. Raghavendra <raghu@mri.ernet.in> | See mail headers for contact Harish-Chandra Research Institute | and OpenPGP details.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16990.42837.393969.612970>