From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 20 10:59:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23411 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 10:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from transbay.net (synergy.transbay.net [209.133.53.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23406 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bh@synergy.transbay.net) Received: from localhost (bh@localhost) by transbay.net (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA28340; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:03:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bh@synergy.transbay.net) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 11:03:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Brandon Huey To: Val cc: Doug White , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: de0 10baset/utp option? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Copyright: (C)1998 Brandon Huey; Forwarding prohibited MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG i have had problems with DEC-based cards (netgear fa-310tx) running at 10Mbps. ifconfig -a reports an OACTIVE flag set and i can find little to no documentation on this flag. i searched a BSDI mailing list and it seems to signify a memory address conflict/overlap. -bh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message