From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 18:15:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7733B16A41F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A38243D48 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 53804 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2005 17:54:16 -0000 Received: from dotat.atdotat.at (HELO [62.48.0.47]) ([62.48.0.47]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Aug 2005 17:54:16 -0000 Message-ID: <430E0ABA.7080600@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:15:22 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050217 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson References: <430DF217.2020908@drexel.edu> <20050825173440.O16967@fledge.watson.org> <430E09F8.8090001@freebsd.org> <20050825191230.C16967@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20050825191230.C16967@fledge.watson.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Justin R. Smith" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Hyperthreading degrades performance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:15:25 -0000 Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> Don't forget better PIV revisions with larger instruction decoder >> caches, better cache prefetching and branch prediction. I doubt much >> of the improvement is due to our SMP changes. A real test to find out >> whether it's our work or Intels would be to benchmark an old (pre >> Nacona) PIV running 5.3R and 7.0-current vs. a new one doing the same. > > Well, given that my test box for this hasn't changed in three years, I > think I can safely argue it's not the hardware :-). Ok, you win. :-) Then the effect of HTT should be much better if you would pop in one of the latest PIV revisions. -- Andre