From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 30 12:02:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA25057 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grunt.grondar.za (odKEZr9+81erGhTtcANxJDpiqyXzDM9/@grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA25021 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (Fxt3FF1RBPF/Rb20r4Yms6glHgEkcZd3@greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA10782; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:01:12 +0200 (SAT) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (TPs7DWKrsQ8wn/4mf4kcQe4QWmsbCfvS@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA03513; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:01:11 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199707301901.VAA03513@greenpeace.grondar.za> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Adam David cc: andreas@klemm.gtn.COM (Andreas Klemm), freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz is out Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:01:09 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm working on this... Adam David wrote: > >I found out, that there are new apache SSLeay patches out. > > >FTP Directory: ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/SSL/ > > > README . . . . . . . . . . . . . [May 29 15:58] 6k > > README.066 . . . . . . . . . . . [May 29 15:59] 2k > > README.080 . . . . . . . . . . . [Jul 1 12:44] 5k > > SSLeay-0.6.6.patch1. . . . . . . [May 29 17:15] 1k > > SSLeay-0.6.6.tar.gz. . . . . . . [May 29 17:15] 814k > > SSLeay-0.8.0.README. . . . . . . [Jul 1 12:44] 1k > > SSLeay-0.8.0.tar.gz. . . . . . . [Jul 3 15:12] 968k > > apache_1.1.1+1.3.ssl.tar.gz. . . [Jul 16 1996] 21k > > apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz. . . [Jul 7 09:56] 24k > > apache_1.2b10+ssl_1.6.tar.gz . . [May 3 21:41] 22k > > >Do you plan to upgrade the apache port with that changes > >so that a secure server would be made possible ? > > And does this mean SSLeay-0.8 is needed as a separate port from -0.6.6 ? > (i.e. does anything worthwhile depend on the previous version, either within > the ports tree or outside of it?) > > :From the README: > > VERY IMPORTANCE NOTICE > > SSLeay 0.8.0 IS NOT compatible with SSLeay 0.6.6 > > There are various subtle and obvious changes to the library so if an > application says it requires SSLeay 0.6.6, don't complain to me when you > find it does not work under SSLeay 0.8 > > [...] > > eric 25-Jun-1997 > > -- > Adam David -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org