Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Aug 2020 01:39:25 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 248285] [NEW PORT] security/intel-ipsec-mb: Intel(R) Multi-Buffer Crypto for IPsec Library
Message-ID:  <bug-248285-7788-Lxok8b5WN1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-248285-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-248285-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D248285

--- Comment #6 from daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net ---
That looks better although I'm not sold on not using release versions unless
it's for a very good reason (personal opinion). Unless we have any direct u=
sers
of this port I think it would be better to ask/wait for upstream to do a pr=
oper
release since master branch seems to include multiple fixes for FreeBSD, al=
so
is the patch upstreamed or a commit/PR from upstream?

Given that extensive usage of special CPU instructions I think it would be =
nice
if we could get a "make test" target so we don't compile libraries that doe=
sn't
run at all.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-248285-7788-Lxok8b5WN1>