From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 19:10:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF21416A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-in.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [62.245.150.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B7A43F3F for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:10:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144]) by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA031147C; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:09:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (ppp-62-245-235-126.mnet-online.de [62.245.235.126]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1301C8AC; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:09:53 +0100 (CET) From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: Martin Blapp , Andy Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:09:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> <3FCA74CE.9020506@richardflanagan.com.au> <20031201014537.N16675@cvs.imp.ch> In-Reply-To: <20031201014537.N16675@cvs.imp.ch> X-Birthday: 06 Oktober 1972 X-Name: Harald Schmalzbauer X-Phone1: +49 (0) 163 555 3237 X-Phone2: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_/Dry/EOpYt2cvwi"; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200312010409.52033@harrymail> cc: Open Office Questions Subject: Re: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:10:01 -0000 --Boundary-02=_/Dry/EOpYt2cvwi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 01 December 2003 01:47, Martin Blapp wrote: > Hi, > > > I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between t= he > > linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386). > > For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the > > Linux version takes about 5 seconds. > > I suspect that our loader/shared library support is more expensive than t= he > linux one. I'll try to debug the speed problems this week. =46or the records: Martin answered to my mail (Harald Schmalzbauer): > > For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the > > Linux version takes about 5 seconds. > > Hmm, could be a rtld issue. Can you trace the binary calls and see > where it spends so much time ? > > > If some of you speak german please also have a look at: > > http://www.bsdforen.de/forums/showthread.php?s=3D&threadid=3D2177 > > Just did that. I'm swiss :) Gr=FCezi Martin Blapp, I answered: Regrettably I'm not familar with any debuging tools nor do I have any=20 programmer skills. But if there's anybody who guides me through "Can you trace the binary call= s=20 and see where it spends so much time" I'd love to do that. But I think explanation was much more expensive than spending your own's ti= me. But please let me know If I can do any testing! Seti's getting too much cycles these days;-) Thanks a lot, =2DHarry > > Martin --Boundary-02=_/Dry/EOpYt2cvwi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/yrD/Bylq0S4AzzwRAqEmAJ9QGO349fc6AgxLeSP25mwWpKcBPACfZ/1f 2ZtWI/KXziG6o1qGeVhrvPM= =Mjm5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_/Dry/EOpYt2cvwi--