From owner-freebsd-small Fri Oct 30 01:55:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA12384 for freebsd-small-outgoing; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 01:55:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from korin.warman.org.pl (korin.nask.waw.pl [148.81.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA12379 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 01:55:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abial@nask.pl) Received: from localhost (abial@localhost) by korin.warman.org.pl (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA06383; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:01:03 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: korin.warman.org.pl: abial owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:01:02 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki X-Sender: abial@korin.warman.org.pl To: Terry Lambert cc: Bryan Mann , small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unified Configuration Interface In-Reply-To: <36395AF4.7614@whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > > > Of course, we are ignoring the real issue here, which is that > > > most services only exist in the first place because we insist > > > on having a procedurally abstracted configuration space. Why > > > > ??? I can't parse it... > > OK; I'll elaborate... it's a fun topic, anyway. 8-). [...] > A configuration space. [...] Ah, now I understand. Thanks for explaining. Yes, it's a nice approach, I'll think about it... Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message