Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 12:24:54 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Xu Qiang <Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The availability of socketbits.h? Message-ID: <20050518092453.GA3537@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> In-Reply-To: <20050518031812.34AF31D92E@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050518031812.34AF31D92E@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2005-05-18 11:27, Xu Qiang <Qiang.Xu@fujixerox.com> wrote:
>Dan Nelson wrote:
>> That for loop should really read:
>>
>> for(i=0; i<command_count; i++) {
>>
>> , since command_count should already be set to COUNTOF(command_list)
>> by a previous call to command_init().
>
> Thank you, Dan. Your fix works!
>
> Still, I wonder why the fix of Giorgos doesn't work, because it seems
> quite right to me, too.
If you refer to the addition of a zero-filled entry at the end of the
array, it's not a fix. Just a description of what the buggy loop seems
to expect. The rest of the program works differently, so it definitely
won't work as a "fix".
> (Btw, I can't understand why this software has so many bugs to be
> fixed before it can be compiled and run successfully. The developers
> don't check their product before shipping out?
Obviously, no. They should be hit hard on the head with a copy of
"Extreme Programming Explained" :P
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050518092453.GA3537>