From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 5 8:37:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from home.offwhite.net (home.offwhite.net [156.46.35.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CD037B502 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (brennan@localhost) by home.offwhite.net (8.9.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02223 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:37:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:37:50 -0500 (CDT) From: BWS - Offwhite To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: AIM behind the ipfw firewall Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a private network set up with ipnat and natd feeding this network with the public line. Everything is working great, but some computers cannot use the file transfer methods of AIM. It complains about the firewall, but I am currently running an open firewall. I have some set up with a full IP redirect so they can get all traffic for all ports to that IP, but for the dhcp users I simply have ipnat doing a blanket translation for a single IP. So they do not have a complete hold on the ports they may want to use. I am not sure how I could make this work for everyone besides giving everyone a full translation for public to private IP. Does anyone have a solution for this? Brennan Stehling - web developer and sys admin projects: www.greasydaemon.com | www.onmilwaukee.com | www.sncalumni.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message