From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 22 20:45:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tick.ssec.wisc.edu (tick.ssec.wisc.edu [144.92.108.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B063E14D31 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 20:45:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dglo@tick.ssec.wisc.edu) Received: from tick.ssec.wisc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tick.ssec.wisc.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA17794; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 22:44:44 -0600 (CST) From: Dave Glowacki Message-Id: <199903230444.WAA17794@tick.ssec.wisc.edu> To: John Baldwin Cc: Mike Meyer , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Musings about tracking FreeBSD... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Mar 1999 21:01:23 EST." Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 22:44:38 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have a very simple shell script that greps /usr/ports/INDEX to find ports > that need updating. It does have the rare false alarm (namely pgp-2.6.2). Bruce Mah's Perl script in /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg_version does this, too. > Also, I find that /usr/ports/INDEX isn't always up to date with the rest of the > ports tree, occasionally producing another false alarm, but these are easy to > find by just checking the version in the respective ports Makefile. You can also fix the out-of-date /usr/ports/INDEX problem by doing a "make index" in /usr/ports, but this gives your disk a MAJOR workout and takes a while to complete, so the fix might be worse than the problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message