From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec  1 06:52:24 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D20D5EA
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Dec 2012 06:52:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gonzo@id.bluezbox.com)
Received: from id.bluezbox.com (id.bluezbox.com [88.198.91.248])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128008FC08
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Sat,  1 Dec 2012 06:52:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [207.6.254.8] (helo=[192.168.1.67])
 by id.bluezbox.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
 (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <gonzo@id.bluezbox.com>)
 id 1Tegvu-000ATW-G6; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:52:16 -0800
Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Raspberry Pi 512MB (with U-Boot + ubldr)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <77F52EC474BD4D8EA39FEB644359FCD3@ad.peach.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:51:58 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D0001F17-E077-4B8F-9A71-725053DD3453@bluezbox.com>
References: <3988C1622A974F19A9D3888F0334FF10@ad.peach.ne.jp>
 <50B8058C.9030909@bluezbox.com>
 <77F52EC474BD4D8EA39FEB644359FCD3@ad.peach.ne.jp>
To: Daisuke Aoyama <aoyama@peach.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Sender: gonzo@id.bluezbox.com
X-Spam-Level: --
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "id.bluezbox.com",
 has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 The administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  On 2012-11-30, at 2:40 AM,
 Daisuke Aoyama <aoyama@peach.ne.jp>
 wrote: >>> BTW, SDHCI is not yet stable? >> There is one issue with setting
 SDHCI clock. I'll commit fix later today. > > I will test new version. I
 noticed your blog is updated. > So,
 I made small improvement for serial console.
 > Please check the attached patch. [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 [score: 0.0000]
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 06:52:24 -0000


On 2012-11-30, at 2:40 AM, Daisuke Aoyama <aoyama@peach.ne.jp> wrote:

>>> BTW, SDHCI is not yet stable?
>> There is one issue with setting SDHCI clock. I'll commit fix later today.
> 
> I will test new version. I noticed your blog is updated.
> So, I made small improvement for serial console.
> Please check the attached patch.

Thanks! I'll update build script.

> 
> If ubldr can get from u-boot environment(uenv.txt), I think it's perfect.