From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 4 02:28:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8686816A4CE; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 02:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3835843D1F; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 02:28:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.org (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.0.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i549ZI8i029362; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 03:35:19 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <40C0408A.90404@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 03:27:38 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ganbold References: <6.1.0.6.2.20040604173402.02db3468@202.179.0.80> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20040604173402.02db3468@202.179.0.80> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IBM e325 ServeRAID-6M on FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:28:21 -0000 Ganbold wrote: > Hi, > > We are planning to purchase IBM e325 server with ServeRAID-6M and Dual > AMD Opteron 2.2Ghz CPU. > Did somebody make FreeBSD 5.x work on IBM e325 server with ServeRAID-6M > before? > Are there any known problems and issues? > Will FreeBSD 5.x work on it? > > thanks in advance, > > Ganbold > The serveraid cards should work, but I haven't audited the driver for 64-bit cleanliness. I also haven't heard of any reports, positive nor negative, about it, so it's up to you if you want to experiment. If it doesn't work, let me know. Scott