From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 13 19:37:27 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7091F638
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se)
Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com
 [212.247.8.98])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F292F6B
 for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB
Message-ID: <520A891D.7070201@intersonic.se>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:29:33 +0200
From: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se>
Organization: Intersonic AB
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130630 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: perl-5.12.5 This port is marked DEPRECATED
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:37:27 -0000

OK, fine.

And what should we replace it with on a production 9.2-PRERELEASE? 5.14?
5.16? 5.,18?

Which would be least painful?

Thanks for any input.

//per