From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Mar  9 01:29:39 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA04870
          for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 01:29:39 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (daemon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA04810
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 01:29:24 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au)
Message-Id: <199803090929.BAA04810@hub.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA036034861; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 20:14:21 +1100
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: 430tx vs SIS 5591
To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 20:14:21 +1100 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


How do the newer SiS PCI chipsets rack up against the Intel 430TX ?
Do they have the same caching problems (RAM coverage limitations) ?

Also, 16550 support is common these days, but what about support for
newer serial chips (such as the 83877) ?

Darren

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message