From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 23 14:52:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA00442 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:52:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from solist. ([193.219.246.204]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA00434 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:52:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from partitur.se by solist. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id XAA02199; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:50:07 +0200 Message-ID: <344FC68F.A732B73D@partitur.se> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:50:07 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer CC: "C. Stephen Gunn" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ajk@wspout.com, ab@wspout.com, csg@wspout.com Subject: netatalk still broken in 2.2-STABLE References: <199710152137.VAA15472@mail.wintek.com> <34453838.794BDF32@whistle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi! >From GNATS: Problem Report kern/4776 Release FreeBSD 2.2-STABLE i386 Description After starting atalkd, any nbprgstr fails. This is since at_control.c and ddp_output.c have been merged in from -current. Fix Use the old at_control.c and ddp_output.c :-) ----------------------------------------------------------- It still doesn't work. This isn't stable to me ;-) It was reported a week ago and there is an obvious fix. Why can't the broken code be removed from stable? I don't get it. I just supped and rebuilded, and the problem remains. Is this also in the release? /palle Julian Elischer wrote: > > C. Stephen Gunn wrote: > > > > In message <199710151811.NAA04074@argon.vapornet.com>, John Preisler writes: > > > > >I"ll try pulling the older .c files off tape and rebuilding. > > > > I tried pulling older versions of: > > > > sys/netatalk/at_control.c 1.14 > > sys/netatalk/ddp_output.c 1.4 > > > > Both of these versions are before some changes that julian@freebsd.org > > made to fix a problem with routing packets to hosts that were on > > a different net, but the same netrange as a given interface. > > > > In particular (this could be conjecture), the problem could be with > > the aa_claim_addr() routine in at_control.c. > > did this fix it? > it shouldn't. > I run those patches here. > what problems do you have? > > > > > I'm not a big kernel hacker type, so I won't say any more. > > > > I also applied the patch from http://www.umch.edu/~rsug/netatalk/patches/ > > for MacOS 8 fixes. It might be a good idea to add this to the 1.4b2 > > port in ports/net/netatalk. It appears to work fine. > > > > - Steve > > > > -- > > C. Stephen Gunn Wintek Corporation > > E-mail: csg@wintek.com 427 N 6th Street > > Tel: +1 (765) 742-8428 Lafayette, IN 47901-1126 > > Fax: +1 (765) 742-0547 United States of America