Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:48:15 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201297] [REVIVE PORT] security/chkrootkit: Update to 0.50, now builds with wtmpx on FreeBSD 10.1, code included Message-ID: <bug-201297-13-Ud0sa0pSop@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201297-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201297-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201297 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needs-patch, needs-qa |patch, patch-ready Flags|maintainer-feedback?(lacey. |maintainer-feedback+ |leanne@gmail.com) | Status|New |Open --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- Perfect Lacey! The only other thing I would suggest is setting MAINTAINER to yourself, or asking the previous maintainer if they are OK with being put back in the driver seat :) The only thing maintainers need to do regarding issues they create here for changes, is to: * set the maintainer-feedack flag from "?" to "+" when they respond, and * set maintainer-approval to "+" on attachments they that approve in cases where they are the approving party, ie: - When person creating the attachment is MAINTAINER - When the port currently has no maintainer (MAINTAINER=ports@) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201297-13-Ud0sa0pSop>