Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 04 Jul 2015 02:48:15 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 201297] [REVIVE PORT] security/chkrootkit: Update to 0.50, now builds with wtmpx on FreeBSD 10.1, code included
Message-ID:  <bug-201297-13-Ud0sa0pSop@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-201297-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-201297-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201297

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needs-patch, needs-qa       |patch, patch-ready
              Flags|maintainer-feedback?(lacey. |maintainer-feedback+
                   |leanne@gmail.com)           |
             Status|New                         |Open

--- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Perfect Lacey!

The only other thing I would suggest is setting MAINTAINER to yourself, or
asking the previous maintainer if they are OK with being put back in the driver
seat :)

The only thing maintainers need to do regarding issues they create here for
changes, is to:

 * set the maintainer-feedack flag from "?" to "+" when they respond, and 
 * set maintainer-approval to "+" on attachments they that approve in cases
where they are the approving party, ie:

 - When person creating the attachment is MAINTAINER
 - When the port currently has no maintainer (MAINTAINER=ports@)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201297-13-Ud0sa0pSop>