From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 5 18:29:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012B51065670; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper-int.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e002::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D85C8FC12; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e010:862b:2bff:febc:8956]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p75IT5hh021337; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 03:29:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p75IT3MR081947; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 03:29:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 03:28:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20110806.032853.106871784954085489.hrs@allbsd.org> To: d@delphij.net, delphij@delphij.net From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <4E3C2DDA.7060700@delphij.net> References: <4E3C2DDA.7060700@delphij.net> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]); Sat, 06 Aug 2011 03:29:16 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.6 required=13.0 tests=BAYES_00, CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipv6_ifconfig_ vs ifconfig__ipv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:29:29 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xin LI wrote in <4E3C2DDA.7060700@delphij.net>: de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- de> Hash: SHA256 de> de> Hi, de> de> It seems that in 9.x the preferred way of configuring an IPv6 enabled de> interface have been changed from ipv6_ifconfig_ to de> ifconfig__ipv6, and there is no corresponding way of configuring de> aliases as they are merged into ifconfig__alias. de> de> Will ipv6_ifconfig_ and _alias be removed in 10, or they would de> stay for a while? This would need some changes in third party software de> like FreeNAS and ifconfig__ipv6 is not yet supported in 8.x I think. $ipv6_ifconfig_* will be removed in 10. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk48NmYACgkQTyzT2CeTzy05RgCg1tpuTbkxi1xuLbeDlRL2OFqU B5IAn0ySngzddvL/2vt0JJ4VC8iDSoYA =smOv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Aug__6_03_28_53_2011_036)----