From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 09:18:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 50AB7AF; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:18:22 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: olli hauer Subject: Re: svn commit: r365003 - head/devel/elfsh/files Message-ID: <20140817091822.GA51054@FreeBSD.org> References: <201408151704.s7FH4f4W071527@svn.freebsd.org> <20140816164551.GA86642@FreeBSD.org> <53EF9469.3070704@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53EF9469.3070704@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:18:22 -0000 On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 07:27:05PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: > There are 1182 ports with an '_' in the name and I think reading a patch name > patch-mod_foo__main.c is easier to read then > patch-mod_foo_main.c > patch-mod_foo-main.c > patch-mod_foo--main.c > patch-mod_foo+main.c Apparently there *are* people who don't see the ugliness of __! I'm honestly surprized; I was under impession that we're stuck with this __ stupidity only because people do not care. > Sample ports that will get really bad patch names with '-' or '+' or a > single '_'as new path separtor > > o japanese/timidity++-slang > o lang/libstdc++_stldoc > o textproc/libxml++26-reference > o databases/mysql-connector-c++ > o devel/bncsutil-ghost++ You're welcome to join the discussion on phabricator with specific examples. ./danfe