From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 25 19:31:40 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209C5106568C;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:31:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rivanr@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-bw0-f206.google.com (mail-bw0-f206.google.com
	[209.85.218.206])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A1F8FC20;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:31:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so2004079bwz.43
	for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
	:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=uNhwHaPusyurmIKC15ADUHe1TW59vcsSuGgMk8uzk1Q=;
	b=XlnrJj1fWpm906ewXrFQOnxNdvKVgMpshCe1xSq+zw8gvzjFiDKa4nlnsWIJ5Xul/H
	IGiS1lK2l0Rp9+ksZPv048wtdQwqzUeTqm24rf3Nox+Y2P/397x+9rGhjh2Hvdoh0L/O
	lyzh7uRNIL6W/vZmdxZw+MdVK37WlXHlhupdE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=dVBkC7inYImwC/OJh/MNbEpHmwB2qRRRJz83tV3X9u+CY6alvaPx9bIP3Eb664NIbl
	vi04NMMH6csrnrgry0IhAdGKKg228uvi1qQtnJbUd/Us8vreYBJa98+rrs3m4pixS/mG
	C+0rJkNl64oDZzQbVCrRn3wEcI6BdH3l57TkM=
Received: by 10.102.178.11 with SMTP id a11mr2858959muf.129.1251228698066;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from azdaja.softwarehood.com ([95.180.33.218])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm1495217muf.7.2009.08.25.12.31.37
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A943C18.2050103@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:31:36 +0200
From: Ivan Radovanovic <rivanr@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090708)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org>	<4A94325D.6070201@FreeBSD.org>
	<4A9436A7.2020108@gmail.com> <4A94385A.1000405@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A94385A.1000405@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Brian Somers <brian@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:31:40 -0000

Doug Barton napisa:
> If you're developing your own app to display running processes
> implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
> question at hand.
>
> Doug
>   
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you 
believe it is done the best way it could be done.
Although there is another way to solve this "problem" - manual can be 
changed to state in the first row "process status formated for terminal 
output" instead of "process status" which is now title for ps. That way 
it would be obvious at the first look that ps is tightly coupled with 
terminal it is running on and nobody would need to learn this harder way.

Regards,
Ivan