From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 9 14:44:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781411065673 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:44:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from resit.sahin@inforcept.com) Received: from nusret.endersys.com (nusret.endersys.com [77.92.112.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31E48FC12 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 14:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (surmail 4359 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2012 14:35:31 -0000 Received: from asy62.asy144.tellcom.com.tr (HELO AuthenticatedHELO) (resit.sahin@inforcept.com@[Authenticated]) (envelope-sender ) by nusret.endersys.com (surmail-1.0) with SMTP for ; 9 Aug 2012 14:35:31 -0000 Message-ID: <5023CB54.4090701@inforcept.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 17:38:12 +0300 From: Resit Sahin Organization: Endersys-Inforcept User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NUMA support in FreeBSD 9.0 / 9.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: resit.sahin@inforcept.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:44:56 -0000 Hello, Does FreeBSD 9.0 or 9.1 "fully" support NUMA Architectures? It is said that FreeBSD 9.0 has an initial NUMA support but is this initial support enough for getting major performance gains? Regards, Resit Sahin