Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:42:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206454] dns/samba-nsupdate does not build with security/krb5 Message-ID: <bug-206454-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206454 Bug ID: 206454 Summary: dns/samba-nsupdate does not build with security/krb5 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: chris@chrullrich.net CC: cy@FreeBSD.org, timur@FreeBSD.org CC: cy@FreeBSD.org, timur@FreeBSD.org dns/samba-nsupdate fails in configure if Kerberos is security/krb5 (and base Heimdal is not present) on stable/10. It tests various library combinations, including one that would work, but fails to compile its conftest program an= yway because in MIT Kerberos, the function it tests for is not named gsskrb5_register_acceptor_identity(), but krb5_gss_register_acceptor_identity(). The name is adapted by a macro in <gssapi/gssapi_krb5.h>. Including that he= ader does not help either, because it brings in the prototype for the function, = so now the conftest build fails in the compiler (missing arguments) rather tha= n in the linker (missing symbol). This is not so much a problem with the port as with the underlying bind-9 distribution's configure script; it would be better to ask krb5-config than= try to puzzle out the flags, but it does not do that. I was able to make it work by patching the symbol renaming into the appropr= iate library check in configure.in (-Dgsskrb5_...=3Dkrb5_gss_...), but that is obviously not fit for general distribution. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206454-13>