From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 17 18:52:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE13F3C1; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marko.cupac@mimar.rs) Received: from www.mimar.rs (www.mimar.rs [193.53.106.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683BE2A6E; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kaa.mimar.rs (178-221-85-142.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs [178.221.85.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by www.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDD39B9022; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:52:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:52:08 +0200 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: reproducible dump possibly related to ath and virtualbox Message-Id: <20130917205208.7a978cf84d28f781f57741dc@mimar.rs> In-Reply-To: References: <20130915144827.39a207b0c3417aad75a18f79@mimar.rs> <20130917094507.bab50639749da1f173762588@mimar.rs> Organization: Mimar X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:52:12 -0000 On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:24:20 -0700 Adrian Chadd wrote: > what did it break? Nothing related to wifi, but with -HEAD and -10 being experimental, I had various problems, some related to building ports, some to general stability and compatibility. > I have no current plans (as a general statement) to backport from -HEAD to > any other branches. Sorry. Well then majority of FreeBSD users will have to wait a year or so until they benefit from your hard work, as I guess this is the time needed for current -10 to become -RELEASE. Thank you anyway, and best regards. -- Marko Cupać