From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 20:13:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EB2106566C for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730188FC14 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pluknet@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so129923fgb.35 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RBDxYr5jIsVYDfwIdzrABRFQsZpHNb9mXt/ZkVurFyM=; b=u3e0DKFnMAT53IQDRMTUD2uhNLjQM8vrxK8MOxBxceWSbyj9N9bcmp93ujhi3C9Mh0 CXFEgaj59sTlLTBYbmvH69WyzODK/Y7p2tyuClnhLFWGwPH3itnpkLZNZ+tfUtpDjnHu +Rx1LJrIG7+Uf/HsYqiNicfZSLfORlKHnhNZw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AYBX50y4j4btJKWJTefZDUmVHQD7C90NzEa0o5t8VOEaeK7+lJn2CCp/F+Qa/2olc5 U6R/HlEITPlH4lUzc6SwpLib41zKnPmW3ipupkZ0a3L3JHPhA/p+eJ1bWC3HHoEnTX8g 6fZ18G3So+9dFv0dAuj57qHMO/nFwgEiOzRTM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.29.8 with SMTP id c8mr96444fgc.67.1235506413453; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:13:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200902241956.46306.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200902241956.46306.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:13:33 +0300 Message-ID: From: pluknet To: "Daniel O'Connor" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: E7400 Speedstep support? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:13:35 -0000 2009/2/24 Daniel O'Connor : > Hi, > I recently got a new Intel E7400 based system and dmesg reports.. > est0: on cpu0 > est0: Guessed bus clock (high) of 37 MHz > est0: Guessed bus clock (low) of 466 MHz > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6164a2206004a22 > device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > cpu1: on acpi0 > est1: on cpu1 > est1: Guessed bus clock (high) of 37 MHz > est1: Guessed bus clock (low) of 466 MHz > est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. > est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6164a2206004a22 > device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > > I'm running 7.1-STABLE and I was wondering how hard it is to add support for > est for this CPU? > May those error messages be BIOS related? >From my E7200 (well, this is from -current): cpu0: on acpi0 ACPI Warning (tbutils-0243): Incorrect checksum in table [OEMB] - CF, should be C6 [20070320] est0: on cpu0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 est1: on cpu1 p4tcc1: on cpu1 dev.cpu has also expected values. -- wbr, pluknet