From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 17 17:09:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564BC16A412 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B1343D4C for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:09:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GP09I-0001YQ-85 for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:09:44 +0200 Received: from p548fcbdf.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.143.203.223]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:09:44 +0200 Received: from rotkap by p548fcbdf.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:09:44 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org From: Heino Tiedemann Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:08:48 +0200 Organization: yes Lines: 41 Message-ID: <02c0u3-ui41.ln1@news.t-online.com> References: <200609171256.24488.nb_root@videotron.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p548fcbdf.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW; ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R; w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O Subject: Re: Why there is a newer OOo port than the binary? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:09:48 -0000 Nicolas Blais wrote: > On Sunday 17 September 2006 12:52, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I have installed editors/openoffice.org-2.0 on my FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE. >> >> >> For a long time "pkg_version -l '<'" shows me, that my installed >> OpenOffice.org is older than the OpenOffice.org in the >> portscollection... >> >> >> I'd like to install the latest editors/openoffice.org-2.0, yes, but... >> >> Where is the package on ftp://ooopackages.good-day.net? I cannot find >> it there. >> >> My installed package is "OOo_2.0.3_FreeBSD61Intel_install_de.tbz" >> Where is the new one? >> >> Heino > > 2.0.4 is not officially released yet. > The one in the ports tree is a release > candidate. I assume a 2.0.4 binary will be made when 2.0.4 goes out of RC. > Anyway, there are problems with 2.0.4 so you are still better off with 2.0.3 > right now... Too me Okay, but the pkg-version output is annoying. Why the 2.0.4 canditate is allready in editors/openoffice.org-2.0? Shouldn't it be in editors/openoffice.org-2.0-devel? Then the portscollection and the installed package will be the same. Too mee it looks, that the OpenOffice.org port is the only one, who "breakes" with the convention between "XYZ" and "XYZ-devel" ports. Heino