Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 15:10:16 +0000 From: Tristan Verniquet <tris_vern@hotmail.com> To: freebsd hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: qsort switching to insertsort Message-ID: <ME1PR01MB05468BBEA2132014B9DFCC1183880@ME1PR01MB0546.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <ME1PR01MB0546A92343D712D8439B299C83880@ME1PR01MB0546.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> References: <ME1PR01MB0546A92343D712D8439B299C83880@ME1PR01MB0546.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.or= g> on behalf of Tristan Verniquet <tris_vern@hotmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, 26 November 2016 8:26 PM > To: freebsd hackers > Subject: qsort switching to insertsort >=20 > But I haven't been able to find much discussion on it. I'm not sure how w= ell known the quirk is. I'm not sure of the rationality for it in the first= place (obviously a speedup, but whether it was considered alongside the do= wnfalls), or what other peoples opinions are. So I thought I'd ask. > Now that I've emailed I did find some previous discussion about it (linked = from the links I posted - I had originally tried searching the discussion l= ists with no success): http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org/msg155127.html The chain just starts positively but just seems to drift off.. Tristan=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ME1PR01MB05468BBEA2132014B9DFCC1183880>