From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 4 08:58:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A1916A41C; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmolteni@cisco.com) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0F243D53; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 08:58:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmolteni@cisco.com) Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (144.254.224.150) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2005 10:58:37 +0200 Received: from amsterdam.cisco.com (amsterdam.cisco.com [144.254.224.160]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j648wYDg010474; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:58:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: from barbapapa.cisco.com (barbapapa.cisco.com [144.254.53.64]) by amsterdam.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j648wT7t016381; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:58:30 +0200 (MEST) Received: by barbapapa.cisco.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 851729C; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:58:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Molteni To: Mike Makonnen Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:58:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050615162744.GP1053@kaiser.sig11.org> <200506301513.55718. mmolteni@cisco.com> <20050701100546.GA1641@rogue.smit.lan> In-Reply-To: <20050701100546.GA1641@rogue.smit.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507041058.28248.mmolteni@cisco.com> Cc: Matteo Riondato , edwin@mavetju.org, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/63954: devfs loses permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:58:39 -0000 On Friday 01 July 2005 12:05, Mike Makonnen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 03:13:54PM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote: > > Mike, > > > > Matteo was referring to devfs.conf, not devfs.rules. > > ahh ok. > > > devfs.conf should die, it is there to confuse people. > > I had thought about removing it, but it still does one thing > devfs.rules can't do, namely symlinking. For devfs.rules to do > symlinking devfs(8) needs to support it. I've been meaning to take a > look at that for a while but keep putting it off. I'd be very grateful if you founded the time to look at it, it would be a much needed clean-up IMHO. thanks again marco