From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  5 06:48:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 71D1916A4CE; Thu,  5 Feb 2004 06:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC45743D58; Thu,  5 Feb 2004 06:48:03 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i15EmH3p099623;
	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:48:17 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from trevor@jpj.net)
Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i15EmHmW099620;
	Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:48:17 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:48:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>
To: Xin LI <delphij@frontfree.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040205141604.GA92489@frontfree.net>
Message-ID: <20040205094247.V96591@blues.jpj.net>
References: <20040205141604.GA92489@frontfree.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
cc: marcus@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: gettext 0.13.1 problem?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:48:08 -0000

> ===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for gettext-0.13.1
> Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to gettext-tools/misc/Makefile.in.rej
> >> Patch patch-gettext-tools_misc_Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly.

> By removing patch-gettext-tools_misc_Makefile.in and
> patch-gettext-tools_misc_po-mode.el, the port built properly.
> It seems that patch-ad and patch-ak are essentially duplicate
> of the two files mentioned above.

When I updated gettext-old to 0.12.1 and re-added it, I renamed patch-ad
and patch-ak to patch-gettext-tools_misc_Makefile.in and
patch-gettext-tools_misc_po-mode.el.  The devel/gettext port never had
patch-gettext-tools_misc_Makefile.in nor
patch-gettext-tools_misc_po-mode.el.  It sounds like you copied files from
the gettext-old port skeleton into ports/devel/gettext.  Your idea of
removing those two files is sound.
-- 
Trevor Johnson