From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 21 06:01:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7EE16A4D0
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:01:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from router.darlow.co.uk (cpc3-bigg1-4-0-cust128.lutn.cable.ntl.com
	[81.103.126.128])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDE343D45
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:01:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from neil@darlow.co.uk)
Received: from ideal.darlow.co.uk (IDENT:500@ideal.darlow.co.uk
	[192.168.0.233])
	by router.darlow.co.uk (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0LE1oV6006571
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:01:51 GMT
	(envelope-from neil@darlow.co.uk)
From: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:01:52 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401211401.52696.neil@darlow.co.uk>
Subject: isc-dhcp3 removed from ports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:01:54 -0000

Hi,

Doing pkg_version recently, I noticed that isc-dhcp3 has been removed from
the ports collection.

Why should such an important port be removed? I can't see that wide-dhcp
provides the same degree of functionality e.g. dynamic zone updates with bind.

Please CC me on responses as I'm not subscribed to this list.

Regards,
Neil Darlow M.Sc.
-- 
ICQ: 135505456  E-Mail, Jabber and MSNM: <neil at darlow.co.uk>