From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 23 13:38:10 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C806106566B;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F738FC08;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:38:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q7NDCHob041255;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:12:18 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:12:17 +1000 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1345697446.84337.11.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu>
Message-ID: <20120823225855.U33776@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
References: <1345697446.84337.11.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: re <re@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:38:10 -0000

On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:50:46 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:

 > With both the doc and ports repositories now moved to SVN it has been
 > decided to not export the 9.1 release branch activity to CVS.  So
 > csup/cvsup update mechanisms are not available for updating to 9.1-RC1.
 > If you would like to use SVN the branch to use is releng/9.1.

Assuming the stupid question is the one you didn't ask, just to clarify: 
does this mean that c*sup won't work with these RCs in particular, or 
that CVS is dead and SVN becomes mandatory from 9.1-RELEASE?

cheers, Ian