From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 15 07:09:10 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0331065670
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:09:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net)
Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85278FC15
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:09:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net)
Received: from astro.zen.inc (astro.zen.inc [192.168.1.239])
	by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 897CE2798B8;
	Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:09:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by astro.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1D97A1704F; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:12:48 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:12:48 +0200
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org>
To: Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090415071247.GA78251@zeninc.net>
References: <85c4b1850902170448p7a59d50bt6bdaa89aa01c51d7@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090217143425.GA58591@zeninc.net>
	<20090217143409.J53478@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
	<20090226141138.GA91564@zeninc.net>
	<d5992baf0904141324g6a0e9678k4754f3ac6c808589@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <d5992baf0904141324g6a0e9678k4754f3ac6c808589@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.
Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re:  NATT patch and FreeBSD's setkey
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:09:10 -0000

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 04:24:44PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:11 AM, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 02:41:41PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> [snip]
> >> We have about 3 months left to get that patch in for 8; ideally 6
> >> weeks.  Can you update the nat-t patch in a way as discussed here
> >> before so that the extra address is in etc. and we can move forward?
> >
> > Done, new version is available here:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/experimental/patch-FreeBSD-TRUNK-NATT-pfkey-clean-2009-02-26.diff
> 
> Hello,

Hi.


> We recently tested this patch on a up to date current as of a couple
> hours ago and it seems to break all outgoing UDP traffic (DNS
> included).

There's a conflict between INP_ESPINUDP* and other INP_* commited
since 2009-02-26.


> Has anyone else experienced this issue?  Backing the patch out of our
> pfSense patch roster cleared up the problem.
> 
> Is there a newer patch available by chance?

Actually, not, because there are no bits left in inp_flags, so we are
actually looking for another location to put them.


Yvan.