Date: Sun, 24 Dec 1995 10:11:12 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: bind-users@vix.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: A Good OS for BIND? (fwd) Message-ID: <199512240911.KAA29998@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199512240740.IAA07566@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from "Christoph Kukulies" at Dec 24, 95 08:40:00 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > Picked this message up from the bind list. > Any takers to answer this? > > --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de You could have answered this yourself, Chris. :-) > Forwarded message: > > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 95 14:11:57 CST > > From: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins) > > Message-Id: <9512222011.AA24236@pegasus.ncts.navy.mil> > > To: bind-users@vix.com > > Subject: A Good OS for BIND? > > Sender: <bind-users-request@vix.com> > > Precedence: bulk > > Reply-To: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins) > > > > With the SunOS 4.1.X limitations (file descriptors and VM system) > > would one of the BSD 4.4 OS's (NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSD/OS) be a better > > choice for running BIND? What other OS's would be a good choice? The 4.4BSD's are certainly suitable platforms to run it. Even old and slow machines like a µVax 2000 or an i386/16 are known to run all versions of BIND fine. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512240911.KAA29998>