Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 24 Dec 1995 10:11:12 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        bind-users@vix.com
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A Good OS for BIND? (fwd)
Message-ID:  <199512240911.KAA29998@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199512240740.IAA07566@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> from "Christoph Kukulies" at Dec 24, 95 08:40:00 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> 
> Picked this message up from the bind list.
> Any takers to answer this?
> 
> --Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de

You could have answered this yourself, Chris. :-)

> Forwarded message:
> > Date: Fri, 22 Dec 95 14:11:57 CST
> > From: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins)
> > Message-Id: <9512222011.AA24236@pegasus.ncts.navy.mil>
> > To: bind-users@vix.com
> > Subject: A Good OS for BIND?
> > Sender: <bind-users-request@vix.com>
> > Precedence: bulk
> > Reply-To: Mike.Jenkins@ncts.navy.mil (Mike Jenkins)
> > 
> > With the SunOS 4.1.X limitations (file descriptors and VM system)
> > would one of the BSD 4.4 OS's (NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSD/OS) be a better
> > choice for running BIND?  What other OS's would be a good choice?

The 4.4BSD's are certainly suitable platforms to run it.  Even old and
slow machines like a µVax 2000 or an i386/16 are known to run all
versions of BIND fine.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512240911.KAA29998>