From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Dec 7 13:37:25 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 7 13:37:22 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (fw2.aub.dk [195.24.1.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D537B400 for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 13:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eB7LbBL92763; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 22:37:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Kirk McKusick Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Getting Kernel Process Information In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 11:38:11 PST." <200012071938.LAA03622@beastie.mckusick.com> Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 22:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: <92761.976225031@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200012071938.LAA03622@beastie.mckusick.com>, Kirk McKusick writes: >I propose to change the kinfo_proc structure. The new >kinfo_proc structure will contain only the stylized `extended' >proc structure which will be augmented with the twenty >fields that are actually referenced from the proc structure >by user processes. Yes! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message