From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 1 16:04:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6DF66D for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greglmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEB5F86 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 16:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id v10so1283890pde.18 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:04:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fe5/tcsDeSEq5Z+ugjanPk6Ezaz4ppWg87o38BrjSzg=; b=IP13TzoHs2+t+CxNpXm/mQqaPH0zPyM1t1hpuu+Zb5RSZIDmGEI6ka6SlnpHh5k8tS oLJCAbRqZW7q/t76kRTKbFw5x6Lm1c82Mox+5A21nJaLT/bq9AYznTZdH2OjEeUCeG9W DDkSjcJd4nUPRN5QitRA+kOZVuo1pl8JHyv30qvhQzK+z7v7QUmKZMODxGgvBMt+bu7b Duu2kLEgT3RBHPpUEtwbPJVprSYYNINTCRbzUzXYvi3+jW1x71GhUpezMM70sutpn8mY VIUTrqdOgA4fHK8HThX7m/wFBlpiH7fK6xyIyXzHBM20DWW+PF0XyLKDyfm2w98qm2xA a7FQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.116.169 with SMTP id jx9mr18570128pbb.94.1364832285461; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 09:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.29.165 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 09:04:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86li92pf8k.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86wqsmpmb0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86li92pf8k.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:04:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture From: Greg Miller To: freebsd-hackers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:04:46 -0000 On 4/1/13, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > You're assuming that maintaining i386 as a tier 1 platform really *does* > add significantly to our workload. Indeed. We don't seem to be running into a ton of issues on this front, and I do still find my 32-bit only Atom-based netbook useful when traveling. > You should also check your calendar :) This is one of the finest pieces of April Fools' Day trolling I've seen in quite some time. I'd rank it right up there with that press release from some years ago about Microsoft's acquisition of the Roman Catholic Church.