Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 11:13:17 +1000 From: "Andrew Reilly" <areilly@bigpond.net.au> To: Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium Message-ID: <20010502111317.A1059@gurney.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <00d701c0cedc$1ee190c0$6405a8c0@neland.dk>; from leifn@neland.dk on Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 07:37:15AM %2B0200 References: <200104171836.LAA06378@akira.lanfear.com> <000001c0c777$f9529b30$215778d8@cx443070b> <20010426175906.B88522@peorth.iteration.net> <3AE8D4DC.E0E35042@bellatlantic.net> <00d701c0cedc$1ee190c0$6405a8c0@neland.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 07:37:15AM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > From: "Sergey Babkin" <babkin@bellatlantic.net> > > Anothing interesting point is that the optimisation for IA-64 > > seems to be highly processor-specific: the code optimized for > > Itanium won't be optimal for McKinley and vice versa. I've heard > > an estimation of about 1.5 times speed increase due to the > > model-specific optimisation. > > > Perhaps commercial software will need to come in (encrypted) > source and be compiled to the the current processor... What else is .NET? (OK, it's a bunch of other stuff too, but processors like the Itanium that introduce serious system specific performance issues (like memory and cache latencies) are a very good reason to persue dynamic recompilation technologies like HotSpot, Dynamo, FX-86, Transmetta and .NET.) -- Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010502111317.A1059>