From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 12:52:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F10C37B401 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1907643F93 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:52:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4MJp3Vo060607; Thu, 22 May 2003 21:51:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h4MJp3MO060606; Thu, 22 May 2003 21:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 21:51:03 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Mark Santcroos Message-ID: <20030522195103.GB60164@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20030522100612.X95471@root.org> <20030522193004.GA1073@laptop.6bone.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030522193004.GA1073@laptop.6bone.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: FBSD 5.1b2 Inst. Results on Dell i8500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:52:15 -0000 --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 09:30:05PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:13:54AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > No, please do not add this patch. It was authored by Mark Santcroos > > and is a reduction in correctness. See this message > > where the correct thing to do is to add RefOf() and DerefOf() to the AS= L. >=20 > Note that I haven't verified it for all cases though, but it most probabl= y=20 > is the key to it. I am sitting in front of an Inspiron 4150 with these symptoms right now. How can I dump my ASL and patch this to test this option? --Stijn --=20 "An adult is a child who has more ethics and morals, that's all." -- Shigeru Miyamoto --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+zSonY3r/tLQmfWcRAt03AJ4zaY57f5XQBoQ94sRMEfnKAQq5HgCbB7os Z2MUiNjLiBRuxT1AoFTv8w8= =dLkB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/NkBOFFp2J2Af1nK--