From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 21 22:31:14 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD3316A41F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:31:14 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wxs@syn.csh.rit.edu)
Received: from syn.csh.rit.edu (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1885743D45
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:31:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wxs@syn.csh.rit.edu)
Received: from syn.csh.rit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by syn.csh.rit.edu (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7LNYBnN034338;
	Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:34:11 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wxs@syn.csh.rit.edu)
Received: (from wxs@localhost)
	by syn.csh.rit.edu (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j7LNYAQF034337;
	Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:34:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wxs)
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:34:10 -0500
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@csh.rit.edu>
To: Wil Hatfield - HyperConX <wil@hyperconx.com>
Message-ID: <20050821233410.GA34270@csh.rit.edu>
References: <NGBBKBOMKLFOJCCDHPEOGEDKLMAA.wil@hyperconx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NGBBKBOMKLFOJCCDHPEOGEDKLMAA.wil@hyperconx.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ports for AMD64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:31:14 -0000

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:13:32PM -0700, Wil Hatfield - HyperConX wrote:
> If several ports aren't available for AMD64, why are they in the listed
> AMD64 ports collection. Am I missing some fixes or something?

There is no AMD64 ports collection.  There is one ports tree and ports
which are known to not work on AMD64 are marked as such using
ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and/or NOT_FOR_ARCHS.

-- WXS