From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb  1 17:21:03 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8361065708;
	Sun,  1 Feb 2009 17:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net (eastrmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.240.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7B28FC16;
	Sun,  1 Feb 2009 17:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net)
Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net
	(InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id
	<20090201164834.OAHT11476.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>;
	Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:48:34 -0500
Received: from localhost ([68.103.37.153]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp
	id AgoY1b0083JFCbG02goZeM; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:48:33 -0500
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=PhtkN44TIKSC7j8vvvwA:9
	a=DmR99DneoPmkCcIksQOz-Gf7FG0A:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=YWHk2nhHdTQA:10
	a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:48:42 -0600
To: obrien@freebsd.org
From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<86skniyp60.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090201060549.GE83330@dragon.NUXI.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <op.uoomb4u79aq2h7@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20090201060549.GE83330@dragon.NUXI.org>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.63 (Linux)
Cc: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:21:04 -0000

On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:05:49 -0600, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org>
wrote:

> "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com> writes:
>> - Replacing groff with something less restricted that doesn't require
>> C++: Heirloom-doctools may be an option.
>
> You're proposing replacing GPLv2 stuff with CDDL'ed stuff?
>
>     $ cd heirloom-doctools-080407> grep -l -R CDDL * | wc -l
>          217
>
> The last time I asked $WORK's lawyers, GPLv2 was acceptable to
> *carefully* ship with our product.  CDDL was forbidden (as is GPLv3).

Interesting... I thought, CDDL is more flexible than GPLv2? Or do I  
misunderstand something with CDDL?

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome@FreeBSD.org