From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 18:04:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A33106566C for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdsfbsd@att.net) Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E4E548FC12 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99057 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2010 17:38:18 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1287164298; bh=lWYGyGd0aruBVE0D3SVvE9dglpsVOsUGobN0AJrbL8k=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:To:Subject:References:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent; b=tr05QRIc2eseHvIOflTpyoBFxu+Vy1hi4DOWbIUOQjYYAv0x/EXbJ3IJZRT6jwGk2n6JJ9h506AXd/0t4TJxwWLpqsfi/WKL9azxPBckefGvaKA9R+CdMbi6YKDkpkSL6+VFSO99/G5QvS0t/ahwwo8MX5RkyyXUTYe0SOzJ+K4= Received: from ack5833s2.ad.service.osu.edu (bdsfbsd@128.146.175.36 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2010 10:38:18 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: d5tX3UiswBBe7eAro3WwBCIcMc7tMmv23kUXyA-- X-YMail-OSG: orun2F4VM1nNFEBx1ZOgBEj6TyNs9.TOSy33BnVXLvUFQkV mP4PkcpxeHsG3YSHctf5PLiWBjJ3r0JvDsz3Ec5tHxddM.l5DrBSNiIPn9BE VZxahsw1FWROrRhO7l7pgtNpRavZsWVB2FHARlgS2TO_Gfwex.kjCI4sXKxW aYqPYYxIUg3KDRqhX13xwTsM5i5yX4E8g5r6fLHP1KNFU2IopYr6I8DXaZl6 RSrbdHvkMSfRNV1lDkH.1mpxh8UTStwigsuKkJxFL94iF2cpmrhjeayseUqZ qq1L59ga0gA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: FreeBSD References: <4CB84A9B.7080605@a1poweruser.com> <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:38:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable From: bdsfbsd@att.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20101015093244.69e01d83@scorpio> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Win32) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:53:28 +0000 Subject: Re: Jail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:59 -0000 On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:32:44 -0400, Jerry = wrote: > On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:35:39 -0400 > Fbsd8 articulated: > >> Check out qjail. It has been submitted for addition to the ports >> collection, but the ports dept is very slow in performing their task >> of adding new ports to the system. So in the mean time you can get >> qjail from here. http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjail/files/ > > I have submitted new ports in the past and they were usually accepted > and posted within a short period of time; usually 2 weeks or so. Perha= ps > there is a specific reason why this port has not been accepted/release= d > into the ports system. Have you, or whom ever submitted the port, > requested clarification as to why it has not been accepted/released? > Before issuing a blank condemnation of the port's department it would > seem like the logical course of action. If you don't receive a > satisfactory reply with two weeks, then it might be worth escalating > the matter. > > Just my 2=A2. > I'm pretty sure I've seen this conversation between the same people befo= re. Ah, yes: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg235282.html= Noting that Aiza =3D FBSD8...