Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:03:51 -0500 From: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> To: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gjournal +UFS - anyone actually use it? Message-ID: <15BA8CB5-A10A-4FA9-AC5F-1BA2B7720E5E@longcount.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303051934550.3311@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1303051934550.3311@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 5, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>= wrote: > if yes - how about performance on production server. I have used gjournal on 7.x amd64 . Using in disk journals . This was on a h= p dl380 g5 using 6 300gb sas disks in a raid 1+0 .=20 I was using it to store large MySQL myisam tables , speed was acceptable at t= he time . I never had any fs corruption and it worked as expected .=20 At the time I set it up I remember there was some chatter about how slow gjo= urnal was compared to ufs with softupdate .=20 Fast forward to today I almost always use ufs with softupdate journal , new i= n FreeBSD 9.0 and available as a patch to 6.x, 7.x , and 8.x=20 This is better supported now , as more people use it in new 9.x builds . > i think about journal on SSD. I believe this is only and option in geom journal , I am not sure if you can= relocate a suj journal to an alternate disk . It should be faster . All I c= an say here is give it a try and see what happens .=20 Hope that helps=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"= --- Mark saad | mark.saad@longcount.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15BA8CB5-A10A-4FA9-AC5F-1BA2B7720E5E>