Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jul 2012 01:44:23 +0100
From:      Greg Hennessy <Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net>
To:        "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" <tonix@interazioni.it>, "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: Question on packet filter using in and out interfaces
Message-ID:  <9EB23F6C23A8B6488E8BCC92A48E83264BB4D26F80@PEMEXMBXVS04.jellyfishnet.co.uk.local>
In-Reply-To: <500826BD.3070602@interazioni.it>
References:  <500826BD.3070602@interazioni.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
For PF I would tend to filter in the ingress interface, tag flows passed by=
 policy and put a generic pass rule on the egress interface permitting the =
tagged flow.=20

The only exception would be assignment of specific flows for shaping.=20


Greg


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-pf@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> pf@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tonix (Antonio Nati)
> Sent: Friday, 20 July 2012 1:25 AM
> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
> Subject: Question on packet filter using in and out interfaces
>=20
> I have a basic question is on usage of 'in' or 'out' interfaces, on
> practical usage.
>=20
> I'm having some talks in PFsense mailing list, and I'm saying there is
> no security difference  about using rulesets on output interfaces or on
> input interfaces, as PF is evaluating all rules in the same phase.
>=20
> At the opposite, I'm told all 'in' rules are evaluated first, than there
> is a routing phase, then the 'out'  rules are finally evaluated, so it
> is more secure to have only filters on 'in' interfaces.
>=20
> Which is the real situation? Does really Packet Filter has any security
> advantage having only 'in' rules, or there is no difference on using out
> interface instead of in interface?
>=20
> All start from consideration that using out interfaces would semplify a
> lot management of complex environments, with interfaces dedicated to
> different customers (one OUT rule on specific interface instead of
> several IN rules on all other interfaces).
>=20
> Thanks for any clear answer you can give.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Tonino
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9EB23F6C23A8B6488E8BCC92A48E83264BB4D26F80>