Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 17:44:01 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Ladavac Marino <mladavac@metropolitan.at> Cc: "'questions@freebsd.org'" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Full FS Message-ID: <19990610174401.B32511@myhakas.matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C1100276179654@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>; from Ladavac Marino on Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 04:23:49PM %2B0200 References: <55586E7391ACD211B9730000C1100276179654@r-lmh-wi-100.corpnet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 04:23:49PM +0200, Ladavac Marino <mladavac@metropolitan.at> wrote: > > Some of the space is always reserved for superuser. Check man > > tunefs(8). > [ML] Well, not exactly the superuser, but in order not to > degrade the file layout (which behaves as a hash and thus starts > significantly to degrade after being 85% full). Naturally, the > superuser has to be allowed to write even after the significant > degradation. Take a look at FFS papers; they are in the distribution. Yes, I was a bit incorrect and my answer wasn't needed anyway. I found two-three answers after posting including your precise explanation. Thanks. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990610174401.B32511>