From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:39:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0BB16A4AB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from www.pkgsrc-box.org (www.ostsee-abc.de [62.206.222.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2F513C55B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de) Received: from britannica.bec.de (www.pkgsrc-box.org [127.0.0.1]) by www.pkgsrc-box.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C59FB9405 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by britannica.bec.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA45F175CA; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:39:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:39:52 +0100 From: Joerg Sonnenberger To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080122143952.GA18194@britannica.bec.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <4795CC13.7080601@moneybookers.com> <868x2i3v8d.fsf@ds4.des.no> <864pd63v2h.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4795FE54.9090606@moneybookers.com> <86lk6i0vzk.fsf@ds4.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86lk6i0vzk.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: gettimeofday() in hping X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:39:21 -0000 On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:34:55PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > More modern machines have an HPET timer which is supposedly faster than > ACPI yet more reliable than TSC. For NetBSD on AMD64 on a 1.2GHz Core2: ACPI ~2400 cycles HPET ~1500 cycles TSC ~800 cycles clockinterrupt ~600 cycles Those are from memory, give or take 10%. This is for the gettimeofday system call. Joerg